Our core approach to “The Sociology of Work" is to include all kinds of work, not just paid work, in our understanding of work. To truly understand the sociology of work, domains of unpaid work and paid work must be considered together. Paid and unpaid work norms and patterns are heavily influenced by gender norms and discriminatory practices.
The entire situation of paid work, unpaid work, gender relations, and family and demography are changing over time together with changing economic and labor market conditions. And this is where we place our research.
We have predispositions to interdisciplinary research, and we use a variety of methods to find answers, from cutting-edge qualitative methods like QCA to cutting-edge quantitative approaches like sequence analysis.
Our research (and teaching) can be grouped in three general areas:
This project compares work-family trajectories of parents born in Germany between 1930 and 1949 with those of their adult children (born 1958-1981) and siblings’ work-family and socio-economic status (SES) trajectories: mother-daughter, father-son, brother-brother, and sister-sister pairs. We aim to investigate the contributions of inter- and intragenerational similarity or divergence in trajectory patterns on the reconfiguration of social structure in Germany after reunification.
We ask:
Tremendous recent economic, demographic, and cultural shifts in Germany suggest that children may not replicate parents’ life course trajectories and resulting positions in the social structure, and that siblings may live very different life courses, with East-West differences likely.
For our empirical analysis, we use the SOEP: longitudinal survey data from a representative sample of about 11,000 German households and more than 20,000 persons. SOEP allows survey respondents from two generations and siblings within one family to be linked and tracked longitudinally.
Professor for Sociology of Work
PEG 3G 118Professor for Sociology of Work
PEG 3G 118The question of women's lack of representation in science has received tremendous attention in the past decades. One explanation for women's lack of advancement to the upper echelons of science is their lack of presence in a given field at the entry and advancement levels. Another is the lower likelihood that women are accepted to elite institutions that provide or increase the probability of networks and visibility relevant for further careers. What if both of these explanations are not the case?
In our project, we control for the quality of the academic institution by selecting one elite science institution in Europe that has an equal representation of women and men at the pre-doctoral and post-doctoral level, in a field where women have been strongly represented for decades. We talk to current post-docs, current principal investigators, and alumni of this organization to see where people tend to go after leaving this institution and what are the processes by which they decide what to do next. How can the exit of women from academic science be explained if the quality of the institution and the „pipeline“ are no longer factors?
Professor for Sociology of Work
PEG 3G 118Rodrian-Pfennig, Margit/Reitz, Sandra/Krömmelbein, Silvia/Heitz, Sylvia. 2014: Einleitung: Reflexive Lehrforschung als "Professionalisierung von unten" , in: Rodrian-Pfennig, Margit/Reitz, Sandra/Krömmelbein, Silvia/Heitz, Sylvia/Bürgin, Julika (Hrsg.) 2014: Reflexive Lehrforschung an der Hochschule. Partizipations-, Forschungs- und Praxisorientierung in sozialwissenschaftlichen Lehr-/Lernverhältnissen, Budrich Verlag, Opladen, Berlin, Toronto, S. 7-18
Dr. habil. Silvia Krömmelbein
PEG 2.G 171
Office hours
Registration by email
Tuesday 15:00